Judith Henry, Forest Supervisor for the Ozark St Francis National Forest has accepted a revised forecast from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for development of fractured shale gas wells on National Forest lands in Arkansas. The revised forecast would allow the drilling of up to 1,730 more gas wells on National Forests in Arkansas, including the Ozark St Francis. Supervisor Henry failed to provide an environmental impact study with the decision. Instead, she is allowing an in-house staff analysis to substitute for a broader, in depth, scientific analysis required under the National Environmental Protection
Act (NEPA). This acceptance letter for the revised forecast to drill 1 ,730 more gas wells in our Arkansas National Forests is not acceptable to Arkansans. We need to let Judith Henry know that we do not approve of the destruction of our National Forest in Arkansas through gas drilling/fracking. They grossly understate the number of acres of impact this will have. In her letter Henry states that "these will be small, 2 to 7 acres disturbance areas each lasting from several weeks to several months before being reclaimed." What she doesn't tell you is the pads now are around ten acres with frack pits larger than a football field. Additionally, she doesn't inform the public of the tremendous acreage that will be deforested to run gas pipelines to connect to every gas well to deliver this resource out of our state. This scarring will last for years, not months. The impact on the ecosystem for wildlife is catastrophic as seen in examples where drilling has taken place on other national lands such as the Jonah Fields in Wyoming. Compressor Stations, dehydration units, condensate tanks, frack pits all deliver deadly toxins into the air, thereby affecting wildlife. Water resources would be severely diminished through the use of millions of gallons of freshwater that is injected into the shale layer with upwards over 50 percent of this water lost to the water cycle forever. In addition, the heavy truck traffic and machinery noise will be extremely destructive to wildlife. She also says the land will be reclaimed in months...How do reclaim mature trees in months? Also, the AOGC allows the burial of frack pit sludge "in situ" or "on site." Is this part of the reclamation process in the National Forest? Also, the dehydration units and condensate tanks stay there for the life of the gas well, spewing the toxins forth. So how does months factor into this? Then let's be honest and say - years....and if they destroy the aquifer through contamination, you might just change that to - forever.
![]() |
| Allegheny National Forest Project |
Please everyone...no matter what state or country you are from...Please let know the people do not approve of this plan and you demand a moratorium on new gas wells in the National Forest. This is public land that belongs to YOU...the PEOPLE!
Judith Henry
605 West Main St
Rusellville, AR, 72801
479-964-7200
jhenry01@fs.fed.us


This is just sad. Arkansas is so beautiful. I suppose that I have made my last visit to Arkansas - I just can't stand seeing what the drillers are doing to the landscape and to the environment. I will surely miss Eureka Springs and its surrounds.
ReplyDeleteyou do not know what you are talking about. You need to get all the facts and then talk about it.
ReplyDeleteNo drilling!!!! Build nuclear plants instead!
ReplyDeleteA day inside the Fayetteville shale? You should really try to be at least some realistic with the video. For example how did drilling cause the idle cattle equipment? How did the drilling cause the idle crop land? The pre-frac water reservoir they show is not on any frac location. I would like you to post a current photo of your post frac water reservoir! Can’t do it? That is because they don’t tell you in the video that within a few days that water was gone and the terrain restored. Now you start out showing the little red. The most pollution I have ever seen on this creek comes from 4 wheelers “mudding” in the creek. Next time you make a video I want you to make it without using any hydrocarbon products!!! If you want green then go GREEN.
ReplyDeleteI certainly do not know why the drilling caused the idle cattle equipment or crop-land, but it seems that it could possibly be the contamination of the land around the land due to the fracking chemicals, thereby causing the abandonment of the land by the owner. An argument could also be made for the oil and gas company purchasing the land from the land-owner which would be a win-win situation for both parties. It appears that the maker of the video is insinuating that it is the fracking chemicals that caused the land-owner to abandon his property. I do not know enough about the reservoirs you speak of to respond to that point. I do, however, object to your stereotyping of all individuals against fracking as "green." I am not "green," and I have no intentions of becoming so. I am merely an ecologist who wishes for people to take care of the environment as best as is possible. I would have few to no objections to fracking if it had negligible effects on humanity and on the environment, and if it can be refined to produce such results, I will stand whole-heartedly behind it. Until then, I must remain wary towards fracking.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete